Conceptions of practice and back pain beliefs among osteopaths in the United Kingdom: a national survey using the Osteo-TAQ and ABS-mp

Thomson, Oliver P., Golder, Elena, McLeod, Gopi Anne, Draper-Rodi, Jerry, Vogel, Steven and Vaughan, Brett (2026) Conceptions of practice and back pain beliefs among osteopaths in the United Kingdom: a national survey using the Osteo-TAQ and ABS-mp. BMC Health Services Research. ISSN 1472-6963

[img]
Preview
Text
Conceptions of practice and back pain beliefs among osteopaths in the United Kingdom a national survey using the Osteo-TAQ and ABS-mp.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (7MB) | Preview

Abstract

Background Variation in clinicians’ approaches to musculoskeletal care may reflect broader practice orientations that shape clinical reasoning, therapeutic interaction and how care is conceptualised and delivered. The Osteopaths’ Therapeutic Approaches Questionnaire (Osteo-TAQ) was developed to measure practitioners’ conceptions of practice, yet little is known about how these relate to clinicians’ beliefs about back pain. This study aimed to describe the conceptions of practice among UK osteopaths and examine their associations with attitudes and beliefs about back pain. Methods A national cross-sectional online survey of osteopaths registered and practising in the United Kingdom (UK) was conducted. Participants completed the Osteo-TAQ, comprising two subscales representing Professional Artistry (PA) and Technical Rationality (TR), and the Attitudes to Back Pain Scale for Musculoskeletal Practitioners (ABS-mp). Descriptive statistics were calculated for subscale scores. Internal consistency was assessed using McDonald’s omega. Associations between Osteo-TAQ and ABS-mp scores were examined using Pearson’s correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals. Results Of 730 survey records generated, 701 represented eligible consenting respondents, of whom 558 provided complete Osteo-TAQ data and were included in the analysis. Participants commonly endorsed both PA (mean 3.24 ± 0.38) and TR (mean 3.05 ± 0.48), indicating frequent endorsement of both constructs at group level. Internal consistency was acceptable (PA ω = 0.88; TR ω = 0.85). The two-factor model was theoretically interpretable; however, parallel analysis supported eight factors and CFA fit indices fell outside conventional thresholds, leaving its structural validity uncertain. TR demonstrated moderate to strong positive associations with biomedical back pain beliefs (r = 0.61, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.66), while PA showed smaller inverse associations (r = − 0.17, 95% CI − 0.25 to − 0.09) and weak positive associations with psychological dimensions. Conclusions This national study provides the first large-scale description of UK osteopaths’ conceptions of practice. Osteopathic care is characterised by an integration of relational and biomechanical approaches. Conceptions of practice are distinct from, but meaningfully associated with, clinicians’ beliefs about back pain and may help explain variation in how osteopathic care is conceptualised, reasoned through and reported. These findings have implications for workforce development, professional education, and the organisation of primary care musculoskeletal services.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Osteopathy, Conceptions of practice, Osteo-TAQ, ABS-mp, Clinical decision-making, Attitude of health personnel, Low back pain, Health workforce, Psychometrics
Depositing User: Ms Raisa Burton
Date Deposited: 30 Sep 2026 13:04
Last Modified: 30 Sep 2026 13:04
URI: https://marjon.repository.guildhe.ac.uk/id/eprint/18147
Related URLs: https://link.sp ... 913-026-15587-8

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item